(SS) Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20241:24-cv-00192California4,683 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SARAH JANE THOMAS, Case No. 1:24-cv-00192-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENY

DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR

MARTIN O’MALLEY, SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND REMAND

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER OF

SECURITY, SOCIAL SECURITY 2 Defendant. FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD (Doc. Nos. 14, 16) 18 Sarah Jane Thomas (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) ceasing her supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. (Doc. Nos. 14, 16-17). For the reasons set forth more fully below, the undersigned recommends the district court grant Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.