Smith v. West Coast Hotel Management, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20241:24-cv-00586California1,942 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:24-cv-00586-KES-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE UNDER LOCAL RULES 183, 110 and/or FEDERAL RULE OF WEST COAST HOTEL MANAGEMENT CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(b) LLC, et al., (Doc. No. 1) Defendants. 14-DAY DEADLINE

18 19 Plaintiff Candace Smith initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint on May 16, 2024. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends that the District Court dismiss this action consistent with the Court’s Local Rules for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Specifically, Plaintiff failed to keep the Court apprised of a current address, failed to respond to the Court’s screening order, and this action remains stagnant. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.