Greathouse
Greathouse v. City of Fresno
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES GREATHOUSE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00715-JLT-BAM Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE SECOND
v. AMENDED COMPLAINT CITY OF FRESNO, et al., (Doc. 9) Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff James Greathouse is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 3, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and granted him leave to amend. (Doc. 8.) Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on November 6, 2024, is currently before the Court for screening. (Doc. 9.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary relief…