Escobedo

Escobedo v. Garcia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20241:24-cv-00930California563 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE ESCOBEDO, Case No. 1:24-cv-00930-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

v.

THIRTY-FIVE DAY DEADLINE

REGINO FLORES GARCIA, et al., Defendants.

15 Plaintiff filed the complaint in this action on August 9, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) On October 29, 2024, Plaintiff requested entry of default as to all defendants. (ECF No. 8.) On October 30, 2024, the Clerk of the Court entered default against all Defendants: (1) Regino Flores Garcia, dba Senor Pancho’s; (2) Yolanda Mancillas Garcia, dba Senor Pancho’s; and (3) Lemoore Capital, L.P. (ECF No. 11.) The Court notes that after the clerk’s entry of default of all defendants, Defendants Regino Flores Garcia and Yolanda Mancillas Garcia filed an answer on October 30, 2024. (ECF No. 12.) However, neither a stipulation nor motion to set aside the entry of default has been filed in this action.1 25 1 Once default has been entered by the Clerk, “[t]he court may set aside an entry of default for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.