Ayodele

Smith v. Ayodele

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20241:24-cv-01100California2,765 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CANDACE SMITH, No. 1:24-cv-01100-JLT-SKO

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

AND WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

SEYI AYODELE, (Doc. 6) 15 Defendant. 21-DAY DEADLINE

17 I. INTRODUCTION A. Background Plaintiff Candace Smith, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a civil complaint on September 16, 2024. (Docs. 1, 4.) Plaintiff filed a document titled “First Amended Complaint” (Doc. 3) on September 17, 2024, which the Court interpreted as a supplement to Plaintiff’s initial complaint (see Doc. 5). On October 1, 2024, the undersigned screened the initial complaint, found that it failed to state any cognizable claims, and granted Plaintiff thirty days leave to file an amended complaint curing the pleading deficiencies identified in the order. (Doc. 5.) On October 22, 2024, Plaintiff timely filed an amended complaint,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.