(PS) Garcia v. City of Sacramento, CA, al

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20242:21-cv-00036California1,099 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL CARLOS GARCIA, No. 2:21-cv-00036-DAD-CSK (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DECLINING TO ADOPT FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS LIFTING THE

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., STAY IN THIS CASE Defendants. (Doc. No. 21) 16 Plaintiff Daniel Carlos Garcia proceeds pro se in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 7, 2024, the previously assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the stay in this case be lifted and that defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted. (Doc. No. 21 at 9–10.) Specifically, the previously assigned magistrate judge found that this federal civil rights action no longer needed to be stayed because “[p]laintiff was again convicted in late 2023.” (Id. at 3.) Those findings and recommendations were served on the parties and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.