(PC) Leonard v. CSP Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20242:22-cv-01231California678 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON THOR LEONARD, No. 2:22-cv-01231 WBS SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 For the second time, plaintiff has filed a “Motion for Discovery” requesting an order compelling the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to produce security camera footage from California State Prison- Sacramento from June 30, 2020. (ECF No. 37; see also ECF No. 34.) Plaintiff’s motion addresses the relevance and necessity of the material requested. (Id. at 5-6.) As plaintiff was previously informed in the discovery and scheduling order filed on March 21, 2024 (ECF No. 27 at 5-6), and in the previous order denying plaintiff’s first “Motion for Discovery,” requests for discovery material such as camera footage shall not be filed with the court except when required by Local Rules 250.1, 250.2, 250.3, and 250.4. Instead, discovery requests shall be served on the opposing party’s attorney if…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.