Scott
(PC) Snowden v. Scott
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS SNOWDEN, III, No. 2:22-cv-1444-DJC-SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND A. SCOTT, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff proceeds with claims under the Eighth Amendment against defendants Scott, Jones, Yang, and Arnett. (See ECF No. 5.) Defendants Scott, Jones, and Yang answered the complaint. (ECF Nos. 39, 40.) On August 8, 2024, defendant Arnett filed a motion to dismiss. On September 9, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to file an opposition, if any, to the pending motion to dismiss within 30 days. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to file a written opposition to the motion to dismiss would result in a recommendation that plaintiff’s claim against Arnett be dismissed. The time period granted has expired, and plaintiff has not filed an opposition or otherwise responded to the…