Cueva

(PC) Uhuru v. Cueva

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20242:23-cv-01321California407 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KOHEN DIALLO E. UHURU, No. 2:23-cv-01321-WBS-SCR P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DANIEL E. CUEVA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. By order filed July 22, 2024, the court revoked plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status and ordered plaintiff to pay the $405.00 filing fee within 14 days. Plaintiff sought and was granted a 90-day extension of time for that purpose. The time granted has expired and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee. Plaintiff has, however, filed two motions which the court construes as motions seeking to consolidate this case with Uhuru v. J Benavidez, Case No. 2:22-cv-00784-TLN-DMC and Uhuru v. Cuevas, No. 2:23-cv-01380-TLN- DB. Since this case should be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee, there would be no benefit to the requested consolidation of cases. Moreover, Case No. 2:23-cv-01380-TLN-DB is a closed case and findings and recommendations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.