(PC) Christensen v. Sacramento County Sheriff Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20242:24-cv-02088California953 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHAD ANDRE CHRISTENSEN, Case No. 2:24-cv-2088-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF

DEPARTMENT,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff, former county inmate proceeding pro se, filed a complaint alleging that defendant Sacramento County Sheriff Department placed him in a holding cell filled with sewage. Because the complaint fails to properly allege a cause of action against defendant, I will dismiss the complaint and give plaintiff an opportunity to amend. I will also grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, which makes the required showing. Screening and Pleading Requirements A complaint must contain a short and plain statement that plaintiff is entitled to relief, Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2), and provide “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face,” Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). The plausibility standard does not require detailed allegations,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.