Luamseejun

Luamseejun v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 202422-721California909 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WATCHARIN LUAMSEEJUN, No. 22-721 Agency No. Petitioner, A207-134-862 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted October 22, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, R. NELSON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Watcharin Luamseejun asked the Board of Immigration Appeals to reopen

her removal proceedings. She claimed her prior counsel provided ineffective

assistance by failing to introduce additional evidence to support her asylum,

withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture claims. The BIA denied

the motion to reopen. Luamseejun petitions for our review of that denial. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.

1. When denying the motion to reopen, the BIA did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.