Luamseejun
Luamseejun v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 202422-721California909 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WATCHARIN LUAMSEEJUN, No. 22-721 Agency No. Petitioner, A207-134-862 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted October 22, 2024 Pasadena, California
Before: TALLMAN, R. NELSON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Watcharin Luamseejun asked the Board of Immigration Appeals to reopen
her removal proceedings. She claimed her prior counsel provided ineffective
assistance by failing to introduce additional evidence to support her asylum,
withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture claims. The BIA denied
the motion to reopen. Luamseejun petitions for our review of that denial. We have
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.
1. When denying the motion to reopen, the BIA did not…