Urzua-Aldana De Rivera v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 202423-2634California1,521 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRENDA PATRICIA URZUA-ALDANA No. 23-2634 DE RIVERA; MARIE VELO SANQUEZ Agency Nos.

RIVERA URZUA; DYLAN JOSUE A206-362-046

RIVERA URZUA, A206-362-047

A206-362-048

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 25, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, OWENS, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Brenda Patricia Urzua-Aldana de Rivera (“Urzua”) and her two derivative

children, natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of the Board of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.