People v. Hurtado CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 12, 2024F087630California2,499 words

Opinion

Opinion

DISCUSSION

Section 1172.75 Prior to January 1, 2020, section 667.5, subdivision (b) required trial courts to impose a one-year sentence enhancement for each true finding on an allegation the defendant had served a separate prior prison term and had not remained free of custody for at least five years. (Former § 667.5, subd. (b).) Effective January 1, 2020, Senate Bill No. 136 (2019–2020 Reg. Sess.) (Senate Bill 136) amended section 667.5 by limiting the prior prison term enhancement to only prior terms for sexually violent offenses. (§ 667.5, subd. (b); Stats. 2019, ch. 590, § 1; People v. Jennings (2019) 42 Cal.App.5th 664, 681.) Enhancements based on prior prison terms served for other offenses became legally invalid. (Id. at p. 682.) The amendment was to be applied retroactively to all cases not yet final on January 1, 2020. (Id. at pp. 681–682.) Later, in 2021, the Legislature enacted Senate Bill 483. This bill sought to make the changes implemented by Senate Bill 136 retroactive. (Stats. 2021, ch. 728, § 1 [“it is the intent of the Legislature to retroactively apply … Senate Bill 136 of the 2019–20 Regular Session to all persons currently serving a term of incarceration in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.