Hamlin

Hamlin v. Jendayi

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 12, 2024A167695MCalifornia9,465 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fujisaki, J.

Filed 11/12/24 (unmodified opn. attached)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

DELLA HAMLIN et al., A167695

Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Alameda County v. Super. Ct. No. RG20061734) ZAKIYA JENDAYI, as Trustee, etc.,

ORDER DENYING PETITION

Defendant and Appellant. FOR REHEARING AND

MODIFYING OPINION

[No Change in Judgment]

BY THE COURT:

Appellant’s petition for rehearing, received on November 4, 2024, is denied as untimely. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.268(b)(1)(A).) On its own motion, the court modifies the opinion filed October 17, 2024, as follows: 1. On page 1, second paragraph, insert “potential” before the words “intestate heirs” in the first sentence, so that it reads: In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude that respondents, as potential intestate heirs of Dr. Head disinherited by the trust, had standing to contest the instrument in the probate court and that their petition was not barred under Probate Code section 17200. 2. On page 12, first full paragraph, insert “potential”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.