Watts

Watts v. Epps

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20243:24-cv-03913California414 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANTE WATTS, Case No. 24-cv-03913-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

DAVID EPPS, Defendant.

On September 4, 2024, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint for failure to present a cognizable claim for relief. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff was granted until October 4, 2024, to file an amended complaint, and warned that if he did not file an amended complaint that cured the deficiencies in his original complaint, the case would be dismissed. (Id. at 4.) Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, and the deadline to do so has passed. On October 23, 2024, the Court received a letter from Plaintiff stating that he “understand[s]” that he “was needing fix on exhausting administrative remedies,” and that he “sent San Quentin the copy of the court paper work attorney at law prison law office to get help.” (ECF No. 7.) He states that “they never sent my court paper work back so I can exhaust my remedies” and that “they won’t give me my mail I…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.