Laatz

Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20245:22-cv-04844California1,151 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NICKY LAATZ, Case No. 5:22-cv-04844-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM

NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER

ZAZZLE, INC., et al., OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendants. [Re: ECF No. 320]

13 Before the Court is Plaintiff Nicky Laatz’s Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 311) (“Mot.”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 and Civil Local Rule 72-2. See ECF No. 320. Plaintiff requests that the Court modify Judge DeMarchi’s October 4, 2024 Order denying Plaintiff’s request to compel Defendant Zazzle, Inc. (“Zazzle”) to produce a 30(b)(6) designee with further preparation on Topic 10(a) from Plaintiff’s 30(b)(6) Deposition Notice to Zazzle. Defendants Zazzle Inc. and Mohamed Alkhatib (collectively, “Defendants”) oppose Plaintiff’s motion. ECF No. 329 (“Opp.”). For the following …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.