Xia Chen v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 13, 202416-73364California838 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 13 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XIA CHEN, No. 16-73364 Agency No. Petitioner, A088-450-750 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted August 21, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: BERZON, BRESS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision

dismissing her appeal of the denial by an Immigration Judge (IJ) of asylum,

withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture (CAT) relief. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

“Where, as here, the BIA agrees with the IJ’s reasoning, we review both

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. decisions.” Rodriguez-Zuniga v. Garland, 69 F.4th 1012, 1016 (9th Cir. 2023)

(citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “We review the agency’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.