Ramirez

Ramirez v. O'Malley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 13, 202424-1891California506 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 13 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANA RAMIREZ, No. 24-1891 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:22-cv-01151-JAT v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 6, 2024 Phoenix, Arizona

Before: PAEZ, BERZON, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Ana Ramirez appeals from the district court’s judgment affirming the

Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her application for disability

insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. As the parties are

familiar with the facts, we do not recount them here. We reverse and remand.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Ramirez argues that, in light of the district court’s 2021 remand order, the

law of the case doctrine and the rule of mandate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.