Openai, Inc. v. Open Artificial Intelligence, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 13, 202424-1963California2,643 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 13 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
OPENAI, INC., No. 24-1963 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:23-cv-03918-YGR v.
MEMORANDUM*
OPEN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE,
INC.; GUY RAVINE,
Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 25, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: S.R. THOMAS, OWENS, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge COLLINS.
Defendants Open Artificial Intelligence, Inc. and Guy Ravine appeal from
the district court’s order granting a preliminary injunction to Plaintiff OpenAI, Inc.
in a trademark action under the Lanham Act. Defendants also appeal from the
denial of their motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and 60(b) to amend or vacate
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. that injunction. As the parties are familiar with the facts, we…