Juarez Francisco v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 13, 202423-556California724 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 13 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL JUAREZ FRANCISCO, No. 23-556 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-988-732 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 8, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, CALLAHAN, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Daniel Juarez Francisco (“Petitioner”), a native and citizen of

Guatemala, seeks review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“the

Board”) affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of Petitioner’s application

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against

Torture (“CAT”). We typically review only the Board’s decision but will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.