Ramadan
(PC) Demara v. Ramadan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EFRAIN GARCIA DEMARA, No. 1:24-cv-01030-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
v. TO THIS ACTION DR. RAMADAN, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
Defendants. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
16 (ECF No. 10) 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed November 7, 2024. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or…