Collins

Collins v. Biden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20241:24-cv-01309California2,638 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARVIN CHARO COLLINS, Case No. 1:24-cv-01309-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE

v. DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE AND

WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND, FOR LACK

JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, et al., OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION Defendants. (ECF No. 1) OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

DAYS

16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Marvin Charo Collins proceeds pro se in this civil case.1 (ECF No. 1). Generally, Plaintiff alleges that government officials, including President Joseph Biden, have violated the Lanham Act, federal criminal statutes, and his civil rights. 20 Because the complaint is absolutely meritless, the Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction 21 and the undersigned will recommend that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice and without 22 leave to amend.

II. PENDING CASES

24 Plaintiff has two pending cases that are relevant here.2 Plaintiff filed this case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.