Biden

Collins Charo Capital LLC v. Biden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20241:24-cv-01313California2,868 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 COLLINS CHARO CAPITAL, LLC, Case No. 1:24-cv-01313-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE

v. DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE AND

WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND, FOR LACK

JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, et al., OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION,

BEING DUPLICATIVE OF AN EARLIER

Defendants. FILED LAWSUIT, AND LACK OF

COUNSEL

15 (ECF No. 1)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

DAYS 18 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Collins Charo Capital, LLC proceeds pro se in this civil case.1 (ECF No. 1). 20 Generally, Plaintiff alleges that government officials, including President Joseph Biden, have 21 violated the Lanham Act. 22 Because the complaint is absolutely meritless, the Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction 23 and the undersigned will recommend that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice and without 24 leave to amend. Additionally, dismissal is warranted because this case is duplicative of an earlier…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.