(PC) Azevedo v. Coalinga State Hospital

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20241:24-cv-01345California2,416 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEX LEONARD AZEVEDO, Case No. 1:24-cv-01345-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN CASE TO A DISTRICT

JUDGE

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

COALINGA STATE HOSPITAL, DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS UNDER

Defendant. U.S.C. § 1915 (g)

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD (Doc. No. 2) 18 Plaintiff Alex Leonard Azevedo, a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 28, 2024. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). On the same day, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. No. 2). For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned recommends the district court deny Plaintiff’s IFP motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because Plaintiff has had at least three actions or appeals that constitute strikes and the Complaint does not establish that Plaintiff 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.