Williams v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20242:20-cv-00598California11,061 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 THOMAS WILLIAMS, No. 2:20-cv-00598-TLN-CSK

Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.

14 15 This matter is before the Court on Defendants City of Rancho Cordova (“City of Rancho Cordova”), Nathan D. Daniel (“Daniel”), Derek Hutchins (“Hutchins”), and Joseph Zalec’s (“Zalec”) (collectively, “City Defendants”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 64.) Plaintiff Thomas Williams (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 69.) City Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 72.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part City Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. ///

City Defendants are the only Defendants party to the instant motion for summary judgment. Defendant County of Sacramento (“County”) filed a separate motion for summary 25 judgment. (ECF No. 65.)

26 Plaintiff’s brother, Carlos Williams, filed a separate lawsuit against the County and City 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.