Safy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, No. 2:21-cv-00637-TLN-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS P. SAFY, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court previously concluded in its order granting plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis that plaintiff is a “three strikes” litigant within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). ECF No. 15. But the court also found that plaintiff’s allegations satisfied for the imminent danger exception to the three strikes bar based on his claim that he had been denied medical care for severe injuries and illnesses because of his refusal to be tested for COVID-19. Id. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint, ECF No. 18, and on screening, the court concluded that the amended complaint must be dismissed as “largely convoluted and packed with numerous unexplained claims having nothing to do with…