Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SURINDER BAINS, No. 2:23-0986 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADAMS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Defendants’ second motion to modify the Discovery and Scheduling Order based on plaintiff’s alleged failure to properly respond to interrogatories and requests for production of documents is before the Court. (ECF No. 21.) As discussed below, defendants’ second motion to modify is granted, and plaintiff is ordered to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion to compel discovery. I. BACKGROUND This action proceeds on plaintiff’s complaint against defendants Anise Adams, Sgt. Bertolino, Sgt. F. Cassillas, and Sgt. Fears for their alleged deliberate indifference to the substantial risk of harm from COVID in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff alleges defendants’ intentional acts or omissions caused plaintiff to become infected…