(PC) Verkuilen v. Amador County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20242:24-cv-00320California340 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES VERKUILEN, Case No. 2:24-cv-00320-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER AMADOR COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff James Verkuilen (“Plaintiff”), a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed 18 this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On October 8, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.