(PS) Warnken v. County of Solano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20242:24-cv-01813California1,120 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL C. WARNKEN, Case No. 2:24-cv-01813-DJC-CSK (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SOLANO, et al., (ECF Nos. 4, 5) Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Michael C. Warnken proceeds in this action without counsel.1 (ECF No. 4.) On October 16, 2024, Defendants County of Solano and John Vasquez filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Michael C. Warnken’s complaint and motion to strike portions of Plaintiff’s complaint. Defendants noticed their motion for a hearing to take place on December 10, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned. (Id.) On November 6, 2024, Defendants filed a reply, which stated Plaintiff’s non-opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 5.) Pursuant to this Court’s Local Rules, any opposition to the motion was to be filed and served no later than fourteen (14) days after the date the motion was filed. Local Rule 230(c). Further, a responding party who has no opposition to the granting of the motion 27 This matter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.