Bubak

(PC) Shealy v. Bubak

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20242:24-cv-02310California339 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIZABETH MARIE SHEALY, No. 2:24-cv-02310-TLN-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER BUBAK, et. al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Elizabeth Marie Shealy (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 09, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff did not file objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that Plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, Plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of her current address at all times. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.