Cooper

(HC) Lyons v. Cooper

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20242:24-cv-02875California1,987 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BART LORAN LYONS, No. 2:24-cv-2875 CSK P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JIM COOPER, et al., Respondent. 15 Petitioner, a county prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. For the following reasons, this Court recommends that this action be dismissed. Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). I. PETITIONER’S CLAIMS Petitioner identifies himself as a pretrial detainee. (ECF No. 1 at 1.) The petition contains four claims. In claim one, petitioner alleges that he is being denied the Keto diet in violation of his constitutional rights. (Id. at 8.) Petitioner alleges that a non-Keto diet causes him…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.