Ana Rosenda Mancio v. Mona D. Houston

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20242:21-cv-09156California372 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANA ROSENDA MANCIO, Case No. CV 2:21-09156 SVW (RAO)

Petitioner,

v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS, AND

MONA D. HOUSTON, Warden, RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

Respondent. JUDGE 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, all of the records and files herein, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and her Supplemental Lodging of documents. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court does not find Petitioner’s objections to be meritorious but does comment on a factual challenge raised by Petitioner. Petitioner objects to the Report’s statement that the 9 mm casings found at her house were fired from the same gun as an expended 9 mm casing found at the crime scene. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.