Danielle Fierro v. Los Angeles Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20242:24-cv-03916California4,379 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Danielle Fierro, MF by and through her CASE NO: 2:24-cv-03916-HDV-JPRx guardian ad litem Danielle Fierro Honorable Hernan D. Vera 12 Plaintiff, vs. Honorable Jean P. Rosenbluth

Los Angeles Police Department; Lt. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Mike Rippe #33073; Det. Acosta #38609; Det. Castaneda #35339; and DOES 1-10, 17 Defendants.

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1. INTRODUCTION 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.