Adex Odiete v. Ur Mendoza Jaddou

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20242:24-cv-06675California964 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADEX ODIETE, ) Case No. CV 24-6675 FMO (SKx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE UR MENDOZA JADDOU, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 16 Plaintiff Adex Odiete (“plaintiff”) filed this action on August 7, 2024. (See Dkt. 1, Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Declaratory Judgment). Upon assignment to this court, plaintiff was referred to the Court’s Initial Standing Order, (see Dkt. 7), which ordered plaintiff to “promptly serve the complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and 5 and file the proofs of service pursuant to Local Rule 5-3.” (See Court’s Initial Standing Order at 1) (available on the court’s website). The court admonished plaintiff that “[a]ny defendant not timely served under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) shall be dismissed from the action without prejudice.” (Id.). Accordingly, plaintiff was required to file a proof of service demonstrating service of the complaint no later…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.