Novalk, LLC v. Kinsale Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20243:22-cv-00290California1,500 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 NOVALK, LLC, Case No. 22-cv-0290-BAS-LR

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY (ECF No. 82) KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. 15 Plaintiff Novalk, LLC’s attorney, Michelangelo Tatone, moves the Court for permission to withdraw from representing Novalk, LLC, in the instant case. (ECF No. 82.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion. (Id.) The California Rules of Professional Conduct permit withdrawal from representation under a series of circumstances including when the client makes it “unreasonably difficult for the lawyer to carry out the representation effectively,” or “breaches a material term of an agreement” with the lawyer and the lawyer “has given the client a reasonable warning after the breach” of the lawyer’s potential withdrawal if the breach is not remedied. CA ST RPC Rule 1.16(b). Where a tribunal’s rules…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.