Charman

Charman v. U.S.A. Home Inspectors

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20243:23-cv-00352California793 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THANE CHARMAN, Case No.: 3:23-cv-352-WQH-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. U.S.A. HOME INSPECTORS, a California limited liability 15 company, 16 Defendant. 17 HAYES, Judge: The matter before the Court is the Court’s Order to Show Cause regarding Defendant Keith Klinger’s purported pro se representation of Defendant U.S.A. Home Inspectors, a limited liability company. I. BACKGROUND On February 23, 2023, Plaintiff Thane Charman (“Plaintiff”) filed the Complaint (ECF No. 1) asserting claims against Defendants U.S.A. Home Inspectors and Keith Klinger (“Klinger”). On May 21, 2023, Plaintiff filed the operative “[First] Amended 26 27 28 Complaint.” (ECF No. 9.) On June 10, 2024, Plaintiff filed a “Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant[s].” (ECF No. 21.) On July 8, 2024, Klinger filed a “Reply to [the] Motion for Default Judgment.” (ECF No. 23.) On July 22, 2024, Plaintiff filed a “Reply to Reply to Motion for Default Judgment.” (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.