Experian

Charles N. Belssner v. Experian

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20245:22-cv-02263California396 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT J S -

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—

GENERAL

Case No. 5:22-cv-02263-SSS-SHKx Date November 6, 2024 Title Charles N. Belssner v. Experian

Present: The Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Irene Vazquez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR

LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION [DKT. 66]

The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff Charles Belssner’s (“Belssner”) Response to the Court’s Order to Show Cause filed on September 26, 2024. [Dkt. 66]. The Court’s Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) held that Belssner’s Complaint did not adequately allege that this Court had subject-matter jurisdiction over the matter and, therefore, ordered Belssner to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [Dkt. 63]. Federal district courts “have an independent obligation to determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists, even in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.