NJOY, LLC v. Imiracle (HK) Limited
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20243:24-cv-00397California2,711 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NJOY, LLC, Case No. 24-cv-00397-BAS-JLB
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX
PARTE REQUEST TO FILE
IMIRACLE (HK) LTD., et al.,
NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL
Defendants. AUTHORITY (ECF No. 68); (2) REQUIRING BRICK-AND-
MORTAR DEFENDANTS
REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SEAL (ECF No. 18 102); AND (3) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE
20 TO FILE SURREPLY (ECF No. 104)
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff NJOY, LLC’s Ex Parte Request to File a Notice of Supplemental Authority (ECF No. 68) in support of its Supplemental Brief in Response to the Court’s May 24, 2024, Order (ECF No. 61). The proposed supplemental authority is the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Davidson v. Sprout Foods, Inc., 106 F.4th 842 (9th Cir. June 28, 2024), which NJOY contends is…