NJOY, LLC v. Imiracle (HK) Limited

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20243:24-cv-00397California2,711 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NJOY, LLC, Case No. 24-cv-00397-BAS-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX

PARTE REQUEST TO FILE

IMIRACLE (HK) LTD., et al.,

NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL

Defendants. AUTHORITY (ECF No. 68); (2) REQUIRING BRICK-AND-

MORTAR DEFENDANTS

REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SEAL (ECF No. 18 102); AND (3) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION FOR LEAVE

20 TO FILE SURREPLY (ECF No. 104)

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff NJOY, LLC’s Ex Parte Request to File a Notice of Supplemental Authority (ECF No. 68) in support of its Supplemental Brief in Response to the Court’s May 24, 2024, Order (ECF No. 61). The proposed supplemental authority is the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Davidson v. Sprout Foods, Inc., 106 F.4th 842 (9th Cir. June 28, 2024), which NJOY contends is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.