Hardy

Hardy v. Silva

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20243:24-cv-00899California3,227 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRISTIN HARDY, Case No.: 3:24-cv-0899-JAH-MSB

CDCR #AA-8633,

ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION

Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA vs. PAUPERIS;

(2) DENYING MOTION FOR

A. SILVA, JOHN DOE, EXTENSION OF TIME AS MOOT;

16 Defendants. (3) DISMISSING COMPLAINT

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) & 1915A(b) 20 21 BACKGROUND On May 20, 2024, Kristin Hardy (“Hardy” or “Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF Nos. 1, 2. In his Complaint, Hardy alleges Defendants violated his constitutional rights when they confiscated and returned-to-sender, a parcel containing educational …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.