Revital Gallen v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20248:22-cv-02031California3,508 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REVITAL GALLEN, Case No. 8:22-cv-02031-WLH-JDE Plaintiff, STATEMENT PF DECISION RE 13] Y: LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE Date: November 4, 2024 GQMIBARYOF BOSTON ant Time: 900. INSURANCE COMPANY, Courtroom: 9B Defendants. 17 18 19 20 I. STATEMENT OF FACTS The following facts are undisputed. Revital Gallen (‘Plaintiff’) formerly 22 worked as an attorney for Ernst & Young US LLP. (Declaration of Corrine Chandler in Supp. of Plaintiff's Opening Trial Brief (“Chandler Decl.”), Docket No. 35-1 4 3). 24 At the time of Plaintiff's employment, Ernst & Young offered long-term disability (“LTD”) insurance through a group policy (the “Policy”) issued by Defendant Lincoln 26 Financial Group (“Lincoln” or “Defendant’). (/d.). The Policy was initially issued by 27 || nominal defendant, Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.