Nakashyan

(PC) Tate v. Nakashyan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20241:22-cv-00624California6,261 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEREK TATE, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00624-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

CUSTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT REGARDING EXHAUSTION

OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

DIANA NAKASHYAN, et al., (Doc. 43) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Derek Tate is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claims against Defendants Custer and Nakashyan, Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process claim against Defendant Custer, and Fifth Amendment equal protection claim against Defendant Nakashyan. I. BACKGROUND On December 1, 2023, the Court issued its Discovery and Scheduling Order. (Doc. 34.) On February 9, 2024, Defendants filed a motion to modify the scheduling order, seeking an extension of the exhaustion motion filing deadline. (Doc. 38.) On February 12, 2024, the Court granted Defendants’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.