Manning

(PC) Marti v. Manning

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20242:21-cv-01829California8,753 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEX LAMOTA MARTI, No. 2:21-cv-01829 SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER TODD MANNING, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed multiple discovery motions, all fully briefed, and all addressed below. For the reasons set forth below, the court will: 1. Grant in part and deny in part plaintiff’s motion to compel on plaintiff’s requests for production (RFP) Sets 1 and 2 (ECF No. 37); 2. Grant plaintiff’s motion to compel on plaintiff’s RFPs Set 1, number 8 (ECF No. 41); 3. Deny plaintiff’s motion to compel on RFPs Set 5 (ECF No. 59); 4. Deny plaintiff’s motion to compel on RFPs Sets 3 and 4 (ECF No. 60); 5. Deny plaintiff’s a motion to compel concerning requests for admission (ECF No. 45); 6. Grant plaintiff’s motion to compel interrogatories (ECF No. 65); and 7. Grant in part the motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.