Cittadino

Cittadino v. BrandSafway Services, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20242:23-cv-00322California487 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 SULLIVAN CITTADINO, an No. 2:23-cv-00322 WBS JDP individual, 13 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

BRANDSAFWAY SERVICES, LLC;

BRAND INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.;

BRANDSAFWAY INDUSTRIES, LLC;

SAFWAY GROUP HOLDING, LLC; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 ----oo0oo---- Defendants request to file three employment-related agreements between the parties -- (1) an Equity and Related Arrangements agreement, (2) a Management Incentive Compensation Plan, and (3) a Delegation of Authority agreement -- with redactions of certain information. (See Docket No. 49.) A party seeking to seal a judicial record must “articulate compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings that outweigh the general history of access and the public policies favoring disclosure, such as the public interest in understanding the judicial process.” Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.