Estupinan

(PC) Doulphus v. Estupinan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20242:24-cv-00417California928 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALANE DUANE DOULPHUS, Case No. 2:24-cv-0417-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. ESTUPINAN, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff brings this action against defendants J. Estupinan and S. Pendleton, both correctional officers at Mule Creek State Prison. ECF No. 12 at 2. The lengthy amended complaint contains multiple, unrelated claims against more than one defendant. Plaintiff should file an amended complaint containing only related claims. If he does not, I will drop claims and recommend service for only one defendant. Screening Order I. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a 28 claim upon which relief may be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.