Hofyani

(PS) Mokaram v. Hofyani

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20242:24-cv-02613California1,192 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAYAD MOKARAM, et al. No. 2:24-cv-2613-DJC-CKD (PS) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER SABIRA HOFYANI, et al., Defendants.

17 Plaintiffs, Sayed Mokaram and Farokh Sadat, proceed pro se with claims for invasion of privacy, negligence, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, among other claims. (See ECF No. 1, Complaint.) All defendants, Sabira Hofyani, Sayed Rahmatullah Hofyani, Zakia Hofyani, Maryalla Dashti, and S. Mahmood Zia Dashti, also proceed pro se. (See ECF Nos. 4-7.) This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On sua sponte review, the court finds the complaint must be dismissed because it fails to establish the court’s subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs will have an opportunity to correct the jurisdictional defects in the complaint to the extent they can do so. I. Background Plaintiffs, Sayed Mokaram and Farokh Sadat, initiated this action on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.