(PS) Yahne v. USA IRS

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20242:24-cv-02813California376 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SCOTT G. YAHNE, No. 2:24-cv-2813 DJC AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS UNITED STATES OF AMERCIA;

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE;

DEPUTY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY

GENERAL D/B/A DAVAD A. HUBERT; and CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendants. 18 On October 15, 2025, plaintiff filed this action in pro se and paid the filing fee. ECF No. 1. The case was accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). The undersigned has reviewed the complaint and, believing that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear plaintiff’s case, issued an Order to Show Cause requiring that plaintiff respond and demonstrate that federal jurisdiction exists. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to respond would result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. Id. at 4. Plaintiff did not respond, and the undersigned therefore finds that this case should be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.