Thomas Gray v. Ken Clark
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 14, 202423-15331California1,055 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 14 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
THOMAS EUGENE GRAY, No. 23-15331
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:20-cv-00196-JLT-SAB v.
KEN CLARK, Warden, Warden; N. MEMORANDUM* SIELKEN, Correctional Officer; L. HURTADO, Correctional Officer; L. JENNINGS, Correctional Officer; SPECIAL
APPEARANCE; SPECIAL APPEARANCE;
SPECIAL APPEARANCE,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 14, 2024**
Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Thomas Gray appeals pro se from the district
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s judgment following a jury trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging…