Thomas Gray v. Ken Clark

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 14, 202423-15331California1,055 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 14 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THOMAS EUGENE GRAY, No. 23-15331

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:20-cv-00196-JLT-SAB v.

KEN CLARK, Warden, Warden; N. MEMORANDUM* SIELKEN, Correctional Officer; L. HURTADO, Correctional Officer; L. JENNINGS, Correctional Officer; SPECIAL

APPEARANCE; SPECIAL APPEARANCE;

SPECIAL APPEARANCE,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 14, 2024**

Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Thomas Gray appeals pro se from the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s judgment following a jury trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.