People v. Albarran CA4/1

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks the court to review the record for error as required by Wende. To assist the court in its rereview, and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386

2 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has identified several possible issues that were considered in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal: 1. What standard of appellate review should be applied to the review of the trial court’s decision following an evidentiary hearing? 2. Whether the trial court erred in finding Albarran was proved guilty of murder beyond a reasonable doubt under current law. 3. Whether the trial court erred in denying Albarran’s petition for resentencing. We have independently reviewed the record for error as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Albarran on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, J.

WE CONCUR:

McCONNELL, P. J.

KELETY, J.

3