In re B.O. CA2/4

BACKGROUND

At the final review hearing in this dependency case, the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) recommended that Mother have monitored visits, without Father present, and that a professional monitor be used if parents were unable to agree on a monitor. Counsel for Father

We resolve this case by memorandum opinion. (Cal. Stds. Jud. Admin., § 8.1.) We do not recite the factual and procedural background because our opinion is unpublished and the parties are familiar with the facts of the case and its procedural history. (People v. Garcia (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 847, 851 [unpublished opinion merely reviewing correctness of trial court’s decision “does not merit extensive factual or legal statement”].) Undesignated statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.

2 and B.O. agreed with the recommendation. Mother’s counsel objected to sole physical custody for Father, asserting that “some measure of physical custody would be appropriate” for Mother and requesting “one or two unmonitored visits per week and maybe one or two overnight visits per month.” The court asked Mother’s counsel if he had reviewed the proposed order…