Silva

Silva v. Sayer

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20243:24-cv-01645California303 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 NATHAN C. SILVA, derivatively on Case Nos.: 24-cv-1645-RSH-VET behalf of DEXCOM, INC., 24-cv-1799-RSH-VET

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING ADDITIONAL v. BRIEFING

KEVIN R. SAYER, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 16 JEROME MALONE, derivatively on behalf of DEXCOM, INC., 18 Plaintiff, 19 v. 20 KEVIN R. SAYER, et al., Defendants.

23 Before the Court is a joint motion to consolidate, appoint lead co-counsel, and stay proceedings filed by the Parties in Silva v. Sayer et al., 24cv1645-RSH-VET (“Silva”) and Malone v. Sayer et al., 24cv1799-RSH-VET (“Malone,” collectively “Related Actions”). Upon review of the joint motion, it appears that consolidation of these cases is appropriate. The Parties have not, however, submitted any argument or legal authority ||supporting their requests to appoint lead co-counsel or stay the proceedings. Absent any ||meaningful…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.